An Update on Medical School Accreditation in the United States: Implications for the Single Graduate Medical Education (GME) Era.

In the United States, medical schools are accredited by either the Liaison on Committee Medical Education (LCME) or the Commission on Osteopathic College Accreditation (COCA), which assesses the quality and standards of Doctor of Medicine (MD)-granting and Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO)-granting institutions, respectively. Thereafter, new MD and DO physicians complete graduate medical education (GME) training. Historically, the two physician licensure pathways have been predominantly separate, but in 2020, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and American Osteopathic Association finalized a single accreditation GME system. Now, other elements of MD and DO physician training that have traditionally remained separate, such as undergraduate medical education (UME), are increasingly being scrutinized. Since 2010, when the accreditation of UME was last qualitatively criticized, the standards and competencies set forth by LCME and COCA have converged. COCA, in particular, has updated its requirements to emphasize scholarly activity, improve inpatient clinical rotation requirements, engage medical students, and enhance clinical faculty qualifications. Such convergence brings to question the continuing need for two independent accreditation pathways and barriers that may prevent a single accreditation. We argue that although MD and DO physicians are unique, the natural confluence of UME accreditation represents an opportunity to simplify and improve physician training in the United States. Our analysis suggests the major barriers to implementing a single accreditation system surround the requirement of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM)-focused faculty by COCA and the two separate licensing exams (USMLE (United States Medical Licensing Examination) and COMLEX (Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination)). However, with a continuing decline in osteopathic physicians practicing OMM and growing debate over a new single licensing exam, a single accreditation UME system may be practically achieved.

Pediatric Program Directors Should Have an Active Presence on Twitter.

For academic pediatricians, social media has become an important avenue for professional development through continuing education, professional networking, and academic collaboration. Pediatric residency program directors have recognized additional benefits of social media engagement via program promotion and resident recruitment. The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and subsequent move to virtual interviews for the 2020-2021 residency interview season have created a new urgency for pediatric program directors to establish an active social media presence, primarily as a means to engage applicants and provide them with information in lieu of cancelled away rotations and in-person interviews. Twitter is a free microblogging and social networking platform that allows real-time engagement among academic pediatricians. Here, we make the case that all pediatric program directors should have an active presence on Twitter.

On the Looming Physician Shortage and Strategic Expansion of Graduate Medical Education.

Among many other things, the novel coronavirus pandemic of 2020 highlighted the significance of physician shortages in the United States. Current projections anticipate a national shortage of up to 122,000 physicians by 2032, with shortfalls in both primary care physicians and specialists. Yet while this figure highlights the magnitude of the problem, it does not capture the distributional aspect of American physician shortages. Though some specialties and geographic areas have a surplus of physicians, others have a chronic undersupply. Appropriately addressing the looming physician shortage therefore requires not only creating more physicians, but also ensuring that those physicians practice in the areas of greatest societal need. This review explores the nature of physician shortages in the United States, identifies the present bottleneck in physician training at the level of graduate medical education, and considers potential legislative and policy solutions to allow strategic and deliberate expansion of graduate medical education and physician practice.